Friday, March 7, 2008

Heartbreakers: Art breakers



Looks like someone isn't very good at hands! Or heads!

Edit: For those of you who like less terseness, here's the blow-by-blow!

  1. Surely statuesque Sigourney would have a head on top of her neck, rather than next to it.
  2. Ewww! Web hands!
  3. This is just awful. It's as if the designer, exhausted from airbrushing the fake arm in had no idea how to end it and just gave up.
  4. What's with the huge hand?
I would have put in #5 Sigourney's blurred-out shoulder, but the other blunders kind of crowded it out. Sorry for the small size; this is the largest image I could find.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

You really should post bigger pictures. Or link to bigger pictures. The details are way too small.

LadyOblada said...

I agree with anonymous...would love to link to bigger pictures. Great blog idea, btw.

ABR said...

Smaller pictures are fine, but only if you explain what's wrong with the image. You just circle stuff and leave us guessing.

Anonymous said...

I agree, good blog but please have bigger pictures with more explanation of what's wrong. I have no clue with this one.

Dalmet said...

I second that. Larger images would really be helpful.

Anonymous said...

looks like this one is slightly better

ungeziefer said...

The only thing I see wrong is that her cheek is too smooth/flat. Think you're looking for mistakes that aren't there...

Anonymous said...

ungeziefer is an idiot, pls keep posting

Anonymous said...

2nded.
Anyone that can't see that Sigourney Weaver's head isn't attached to that neck needs an eye test!
There is loads of bad photoshop out there. Keep up the good work.

Jael Bendt said...

Two comments, this is fucking hilarious.
And you should use a feed for us to be able to subscribe to this.

AH! and yeah, bigger pictures, please.
(ok, so maybe that was three comments)

Great done, gave me the giggle of today.

Derek B. said...

http://bradleyvision.net/Export/images/1838f.jpg

The arms. THE ARMS. It kind of hurts sometimes.

Saw the link at plime and thought I should pass by. Cool blog.

By the way: almost any magazine cover featuring Fergie is worth a post here.

Anonymous said...

ugh. I think your comments are extreme; you were looking for something to bash on. This image is fine

Anonymous said...

I agree with ungeziefer. That pic looks fine .. just a little too "smooth"

maceirax said...

You can see it better in the spanish version: http://www.geocities.com/cdcjulio2001/carteles/lasseductoras-01.jpg
It's awful.

Anonymous said...

Here you will an other littel more brighter, bigger version of the picture:
http://www.ukquad.com/heartbreakers.JPG

I also agree with the argument, that Sigourney's arm anatomy (thick- / thinness) on the right sight looks strange. Maybe some unfortunate perspective, maybe some unfortunate graphic artist ;-)

Anonymous said...

When will they stop making films with two-word names presented one in bold, one in normal with no gap?

Whataloadofrubbish!

Anonymous said...

So glad this one is in the blog.

If photoshop can be offensive, this artwork is the worst of the worst - and there are some pretty bad movie posters out there!

Saw this on buses and 6 Sheets when it was coming out. Absolutely abysmal.

However, after flaming the crap photoshop - why can't movie publicists plan a photo session with the actors in the film? Numpties.

- TDP

cindy75 said...

I tried to look this up, and found a totally different picture. Am I stupid or something because I couldn't find anything for this movie that looked like the picture you're showing.

Anonymous said...

The neck thing is really all youve got there.
I honestly dont see anything wrong with the hands

Their natural hands