
Even allowing for the culturally-ravaged, post-wardrobe-malfunction neo-fundamentalist, sexual dystopia we live in, the decision of Jordache to Photoshopically amputate Heidi Klum's nipples is a profoundly bizarre one.
What were the possible logical processes that made this happen? Did they think no-one would notice? How could this make any sense? Unbelievable.
Via Gawker.
Begun This Clone Tool Has
Have you seen a truly awful piece of Photoshop work? Clumsy manipulation, senseless comping, lazy cloning and thoughtless retouching are our bread and butter. And yes, deep down, we love Photoshop.
If it is commercial and awful then please let us know! Anonymity can be arranged for the easily embarrassed/canned.
Although I am hopeless at replying to email, be assured that each and every tip is followed up.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(133)
-
►
June
(22)
- Garderoba: Jessica Rabbit!
- Maxim: Belly Good
- Lucky: Blendy, Masky And Airbrushy
- Bild: A Quick One Off The Wrist
- Samsung: 9NnSWVS
- Weird Al Yankovic: Facepalm
- Freizeit Revue: I Don't See Anything Wrong With It...
- Audi: Will This Do?
- City of Toronto: Token Brilliance
- Night At The Museum 2: Monkey Stomping
- E!: Baroquey Dokey
- Natural Muscle: Stumped!
- Netto: I Could Design This With My Eyes Shut!
- Russian Vogue: Knee, Jerk Response
- Estee Lauder: Ouch
- La Senza: It's A Crime To Print It
- Hugo Boss: All This And No Brains Too
- Daily Fail: The Goggles They Do NOTHING!
- Veja: Lettuce Never Forget!
- Mike Jones: Mind The Gap
- Kennedy International: Mobiusbiking!
- Adobe: Wet Floors Are Dangerous
-
►
May
(19)
- Braking The Cycle: We Broke The Cycle
- Closer: The Cutout Of Delight
- Hot Topic: You're So Vein
- Crescer: BEHIND YOU!
- Oslo Grand Prix: Horserse
- FHM Germany: Put Your Little Leg In
- Daily Mail: The Scraperboard Of Truth!
- Hairdressers Journal: Linda Blair Special
- Discount Dance: Dance Dance Revulsion
- New Look: Show A Little Leg
- B&H: These Cameras Are Hot!
- MarieClaire: Worst Hand Job Ever
- Playboy: This Is Pointless!
- W: As In WTF
- Mystery Meat: Knee To No Basis
- Im Juli: Behind you!
- Boart Longyear: Corporate Report And Death To Amer...
- Miss Switzerland: Half Itty Car Condensed
- Monro: Now Open In Bizarro World
-
►
June
(22)
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
Jordache: Attack Of The Pod People
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

15 comments:
It's right there! at the bottom of her boob. Very light, I'll give you that, but still it's there!
Yeah, uh, they actually seem to be right where they ought.
Plainly visible nipples would have distracted from the jeans. It's marketing, people!
Some markets do not allow nudity. I work at a marketing firm that handles many fashion clients and we have to photoshop out nipples and other visible areas to keep it more "PG".
Ever notice how you don't see much in a victoria's secret catalog even though the material is see through?
I figured they were trying to imply that her nips were covered by her locks.
All they had to do here was lengthen her hair slightly. Weird.
this website sux!
let's be honest, both boobs are like that. it's meant to be
and all that said, the hair covering the nips could have been done better. This looks like a quick pass with the blur tool.
But maybe this part was a rush, rush, got 5 seconds before the presses roll kind of thing.
I've slept with Heidi and she dosen't have any nipples
Hey, that's Theodora Richards, not Heidi Klum!
LOL i remember seeing this and thinking the same thing.
http://fatalfashionattraction.blogspot.com/
It's deliberate for the sake of modesty. It's not a disaster. I should start a "BlogDisasters" and include this one.
the disaster is, that they just would have had to extend the hair for one or two inches (in real or in photoshop) and they would have covered the nipples perfectly. this looks weird, it's very unsexy if bodyparts are missing...
Photoshopically amputated or not, are they offered on eBay yet?? I'm bidding!! :<>
(sidebar) The "word verification" I got was 'pjgsujw' - what language is that a 'word' in? :><
Post a Comment