OK, this is a little old (2003), but still quite stunning. Either Michelle Branch has no butt crack, or someone decided that this would pass muster. I mean, it isn't as if Maxim readers would have any particular interest in that part of her anatomy, is it?
Courtesy Darren Barefoot.
Edit: For the sake of the unbelievers, it turns out that that issue of Maxim uses the same image inside the magazine, without the crackectomy.
Photoshopaholics
Subscribe
Posts
Comments
Begun This Clone Tool Has
Search
Blog Archive
-
►
2009
(226)
-
►
November
(18)
- Wgate: Demi Moore, Demi Anja Rubik
- Vizio: Your Experience May Vary
- Swedish Taxi: Hard To Handle
- Georg Jensen: Breast Not To Talk About It
- Hardwired: That's Some Jawline
- Ana Maria: The Lady With The Bezier Shoulder
- Leave It To Lamas: No Mas!
- The Spy Next Door: Pull The Other One
- Express: Things That Make You Go Hmm
- New York Lottery: In Dog We Trust
- Morning Musume: Arms Reduction
- Armani Exchange: Going Out On A Limb
- Austrian Newspaper: The Clone Arranger
- Campari: Incampariable
- OSS117: Those Legs Will Take You A Long Way, Lady
- Digital Photoshop Disaster Of The Year, 2009
- Wella: No More LSD For You
- Boots: Huh?
-
►
October
(22)
- Victoria's Secret: Mostly Invisible Handbag
- Everybody's Fine: No They're Not
- Solidea: Detachable Pelvis
- Gap: Wristful Thinking
- Victoria's Secret: Sexy! Convenient!
- T3 Magazine: Trying To Titillate
- Some Dentist: Learn How To Smile Again Again
- Brothers & Sisters: Footloose!
- Victoria's Secret: The Awful, Awful Secret
- buycostumes.com: Bring Out The What?
- JVC: Gonks Love Headphones
- Ralph Lauren: The Hits Keep On Coming
- The Star: Back Handed
- Blick: Stunning Photographic Proof
- Carl Zeiss: Lose Canon
- Oriflame: Symmetry? PAH!
- Mega Magazine: Worst Hand Job Ever
- Ralph Lauren: How To Turn A Photoshop Disaster Int...
- Edwin Jeans: Pittiful
- Pet Vet: Crap Trap
- My Life In Ruins: Down With Perspective
- Skintimate: Forearm Funk
-
►
September
(20)
- Bell Internet: Porn For Vampires
- The Gap: The World According To Gap
- Jonah Hex: Stumpy Meets Crazy Corset
- Norma: Rice-epe For An E-Norma-s Disaster
- Amazon: Photoshop User My Ass
- Formoza: We Are Competent Formoza The Time
- Belgian Toy Store: Hmm
- Chevy Chase Bank: And You're Not
- Meira T: Worst Hand Job Ever
- Paula Deen: Is Your Mother Home?
-
►
November
(18)
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Maxim: Crack Is Wack
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
Look at the angle of her legs and buttocks. She's almost in profile; the crack's there but the shot is across it and you're seeing the inside of her right cheek. She's not been photoshopped. Or not in that particular spot, anyway. Elsewhere, almost certainly; Maxim is not about reality.
Wow bad call buddy. The previous poster had it right. It is the angle of her butt and a good photographer, not a photoshop job.
Well, I agree with the previous two comments, but it's kind of obvious that the picture was photoshopped a bit. I know that some of the pictures inside the actual issue were for whatever reason flipped... Because the tattoo is backwards and on the wrong shoulder. Maybe if you find a picture of that?
Are there any photos that aren't Photoshopped at least a bit. (Even though her crack probably hasn't been erased, it wouldn't surprise me if Americans decided it would be offensive to show it.)
Yup -- it's the angle of the pose on this one.
No PS? Look:
http://www.darrenbarefoot.com/images/michellebranch.jpg
ahhh, crackectomy :D
I wonder if there's some reason? Like maybe Maxim actually wasn't allowed to show a crack on the cover? It seems rather intentional, imo.
That's exactly why. Showing crack will be considered obscene in some U.S. jurisdictions. See Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973). An Abercrombie & Fitch store in Virginia Beach recently had a promotional poster seized by local authorities on obscenity grounds because it showed crack, though the charges were later dropped. Obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment, so it can be regulated or even banned. Some jurisdictions have laws requiring obscene material to be kept out of view of the general public. Publishers who want their publications to remain on open shelves will be extra-cautious.
~Q
Some bottom of the barrel scraping going on here.
Once again must have been a slow day.
This is a great site. Thank you for your information. I THANK YOU I SALUTE YOU IT,S A AMZING SITE.
Post a Comment