
I'd understand this in the US, a country that is disconcerted about women even having nipples, but in Sweden?
Original is here. 10 points to Yvonne!
Begun This Clone Tool Has
Have you seen a truly awful piece of Photoshop work? Clumsy manipulation, senseless comping, lazy cloning and thoughtless retouching are our bread and butter. And yes, deep down, we love Photoshop.
If it is commercial and awful then please let us know! Anonymity can be arranged for the easily embarrassed/canned.
Although I am hopeless at replying to email, be assured that each and every tip is followed up.
Blog Archive
-
►
2009
(226)
-
►
November
(18)
- Wgate: Demi Moore, Demi Anja Rubik
- Vizio: Your Experience May Vary
- Swedish Taxi: Hard To Handle
- Georg Jensen: Breast Not To Talk About It
- Hardwired: That's Some Jawline
- Ana Maria: The Lady With The Bezier Shoulder
- Leave It To Lamas: No Mas!
- The Spy Next Door: Pull The Other One
- Express: Things That Make You Go Hmm
- New York Lottery: In Dog We Trust
- Morning Musume: Arms Reduction
- Armani Exchange: Going Out On A Limb
- Austrian Newspaper: The Clone Arranger
- Campari: Incampariable
- OSS117: Those Legs Will Take You A Long Way, Lady
- Digital Photoshop Disaster Of The Year, 2009
- Wella: No More LSD For You
- Boots: Huh?
-
►
October
(22)
- Victoria's Secret: Mostly Invisible Handbag
- Everybody's Fine: No They're Not
- Solidea: Detachable Pelvis
- Gap: Wristful Thinking
- Victoria's Secret: Sexy! Convenient!
- T3 Magazine: Trying To Titillate
- Some Dentist: Learn How To Smile Again Again
- Brothers & Sisters: Footloose!
- Victoria's Secret: The Awful, Awful Secret
- buycostumes.com: Bring Out The What?
- JVC: Gonks Love Headphones
- Ralph Lauren: The Hits Keep On Coming
- The Star: Back Handed
- Blick: Stunning Photographic Proof
- Carl Zeiss: Lose Canon
- Oriflame: Symmetry? PAH!
- Mega Magazine: Worst Hand Job Ever
- Ralph Lauren: How To Turn A Photoshop Disaster Int...
- Edwin Jeans: Pittiful
- Pet Vet: Crap Trap
- My Life In Ruins: Down With Perspective
- Skintimate: Forearm Funk
-
►
September
(20)
- Bell Internet: Porn For Vampires
- The Gap: The World According To Gap
- Jonah Hex: Stumpy Meets Crazy Corset
- Norma: Rice-epe For An E-Norma-s Disaster
- Amazon: Photoshop User My Ass
- Formoza: We Are Competent Formoza The Time
- Belgian Toy Store: Hmm
- Chevy Chase Bank: And You're Not
- Meira T: Worst Hand Job Ever
- Paula Deen: Is Your Mother Home?
-
►
November
(18)
-
▼
2008
(305)
-
▼
May
(34)
- Ouch: Look Mom No Legs!
- Daily Fail: What Is Your Major Malfunction?
- Monoprix: Lint Free At Last
- Dior: You Need A New Look Dude
- Banana Boat: We'll Add The Shadows In Later
- GTA4: How Many Fingers?
- Olivier: Maybe The Fence Melted Because Of Her Bre...
- Diamondback Bikes: Pigeon Legs
- Ashley Tisdale: Ewww
- Yoox: Maybe She Should Find A Different Line Of Wo...
- Impuls: Vampire Insurance
- Technos: Blown pupils usually means brain stem ede...
- Pago: I'M MELTING!
- Barratt: Artist's Impression Excessively Abstract
- Asus / MSI: Laughing Stocks
- Cheese Heads: Finger Deforming Good!
- Logitech: Honey Where's The VT Remote?
- High School Musical 2: Designer Still In Grade Sch...
- Tuttosport: Insert Severed Hand Joke Here
- IRS: Now Add The Image From Line 48
- H&R Block: H.R. Giger
- New York Chicken Wings
- Felix Dennis: Possible Stray Layer
- Tommy Hilfiger: I'm Stumped
- Bangkok Dangerous: I Can Do That With My Hand Righ...
- How To Cheat In Photoshop By Reason Of Mental Illn...
- Bob Megleren: I'm Sure No One Noticed
- GQ: Gentlemen Prefer Bobbleheads
- Fanta: You Really Don't Wanta
- Channel 9: Australian iPhones To Run Windows XP
- Kroppsnara: Shops Out The Organ Stops
- Photoshop World: Photoshop User TV Useless At Phot...
- Resident Evil: Zombies Give You Mumps
- Nordic Catalog Disaster
-
▼
May
(34)
Sponsored link: Avoid Your Own Photoshop Disasters Join NAPP Special Offer
Saturday, May 3, 2008
Kroppsnara: Shops Out The Organ Stops
Labels:
pod-people
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

50 comments:
that isn't just awful, it's downright creepy.
Its kinda cool in a weird way... Interesting concept when you think about it. What if we didn't have fingernails... or ....
Give us back the black bar! Or better yet one of those motion tracked Girls Gone Wild censored things. Anything but nippleless boobies!
Are they going to start doing that to people's lower regions now too?
there's nothing wrong with nippleless, makes women more aero dynamic...
Sure is going to be tough to breast feed her babies!
I'm reminded of the classic DNA Studios cartoon "Nippleless Nippleby"
yet it is okay to have a slight cameltoe?
If you look at the rest of the catalogue there's a few images where the nipples are wiped like this one, but other shots with nippleage are divided fairly evenly between blurred and unaltered nipples.
It still looks weird, but it's more likely to be the result of differing nudity clauses in the models' contracts than an actual error.
It is clearly masturbation protection... a half naked woman is clearly totally unerotic all of a sudden if you remove her nipples... right?
OK well it was worth a try.
just gross
I think the picture originated in USA. if you check http://www.kroppsnara.se/product_info.php?products_id=249
or
http://www.kroppsnara.se/product_info.php?products_id=386
they still have nipples but they have bin censored on the second.
That´s really gross, really.
hey, maybe she was born like that. it happens. lets not be too hasty to jump on the nipplist band wagon.
i've aways wondered why it's ok for men to show their nipples but not us women. men should be made to feel embarrassed about their useless little nipples...not us.
Oh my Goddess, I used to adore Sweden! How could they!!! D:
Maybe it was a freak implant accident. ;-)
the eagle eyed will notice that in the smaller picture in the left hand corner, she does have a nipple showing.
now if the nips removal (intentional, but stupid) isn't a disater, then i'd say that definately is.
They erase the nipples and leave the cameltoe.
That's old news! Have you never seen an Electric Lingerie catalog? They used to be completely nipple-free, as in here, for example. Erased from every single boob.
But apparently, someone found that too conspicuous after all, because recently, on their website, some of the nipples have been photoshopped BACK IN, which looks even creepier, if that's possible.
But there are still lots and LOTS of nippleless old pics on the German site eis.de.
P.S.: Here's the direct link if you don't read German and/or don't believe me. Not a nipple in sight. :)
It looks like someone stuck a butt on her chest.
Does she fight in the WWE?
Why would anyone do such a photojob? That's incredibly stupid. If you aren't allowed to show nipples, then don't show barenaked women! I mean, if there's a nipple poking thru some clothing or whatever, you can correct that. But THIS is idiotic. If they were trying to creep people out, I'd say mission accomplished.
Maybe she's wearing nipple covers. You can buy them at http://www.iwearnipplecovers.com/ and they're very useful while wearing semi-transparent clothing. :-)
Picture is a good advertisement for these covers...
HAHA You can actually make out a hint of a nipple in the smaller inset photo.
seriously, WTF?
According to the company, search engines like Google will ban your shop if you show nipples. :P
They did say that the publicity in this blog is not what they were looking for hehe.
Clearly this was edited by someone whose only experience with nudity is...Barbie!
the perfect playmate for a Ken doll..:-)8 =#>
Takes all the fun out of it...
here's her friend, with added cutout disaster: http://www.kroppsnara.se/popup_image.php?pID=58
^ ^ lovely...
checkher body out! Not just the boobs!
that's just too much! ewwww
It is against the nature of human-beings but I enjoy it. WOW ! Creative concept! Thank You !
http://autopsy-1.blogspot.com/
http://madness-1.blogspot.com/
I find this picture strangely appealing...don't know why... : /
There's a brand of cheaply made kinky novelty costumes/lingerie called leg avenue, and on all of their package art where the model would normally show nipple when wearing the item, such as see through material, it's photoshopped out. It's pretty creepy.
legavenue.com if you want to see it for yourself
This is a shame, it´s only a beautiful body, it´s something currtent. do we still wonder looking at nipples? It´s not necessary to show the tits to sell underwears, so if you want to show them, show them as they are.
Greetings for everybody from Spain!!!!
I'm (♀), VietNam
I like this blog is so cool
Anyway, It's nice to see your blog
God Bless you
Thanks for sharing. Again
I just draw them back on!!!
-polish zorro
Not photoshop. My girlfriend can totally do that with her breasts.
Breasts without nipples look more like buttocks!
Even those Madonna-tassel-spinny-thingys would be bettah.
That is totally fucking weird but absolutely hilarious, it really is.
So showing 99% of the boobs is non-offensive but show a nipple & it is suddenly super dirty. Kinda like I Dream Of Jeannie, where they made her cover her navel.
If a guy covers only the tip of his junk with a pastie would that be legal in public? Given this example I guess it would be.
oh my god, it's so easy to understand isnt it? the nipples has been removed so that it's not rated as porn, and for a clothing company that would be bad, amarite?
what's the point of having a bra if she has no nipples to play with... jeez then they just become sacks of fat.
"I'm not flashing - it doesn't count if you don't see a nipple!"
I think its censored. In Sweden they often have it like that.
No, you get the nipples when you marry her. Swedish tradition.
She should use the new and renovated Nipple Extractor, thanks to this amazing product, a friend of mine, that we will call Lizzie (coz that's her name) told me that is a woman again, check it out! http://www.amazon.com/4498-Nipple-Extractor-1-2/dp/B0002XH4KE/ref=cm_cr_pr_pb_t
Don't forget to check the reviews!
Post a Comment