Round 1: This is a hot, sexy product! Let's make the shots look hot! And sexy!
Round 2: Let's do this in a way that doesn't break Amazon's TOS.
Round 3: You can still see her ya-ya.
Round 4: If you don't make a picture we can use then you're fired.
Round 5: I neither care nor want to know, just run with it.
Original here! Props to Dustin!
Photoshopaholics
Subscribe
Posts
Comments
Sunday, July 6, 2008
Amazon: Sex In The City Not So Much
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
72 comments:
Eh, it looks like pantyhose...
C'mon! At least she's still got a belly button! What do you people want, labia majorae?
"What do you people want, labia majorae?"
Now that you mention it... YEAH!
Making that...thing...look sexy would be beyond any photographer. But this goes beyond hideous white-trash tacky all the way to creepy.
Next time, they should take the picture while it's still on the hangar.
"I'm a barbie girl!"
You're assuming it's a woman; it could be a man with his cock and balls tucked between his legs, a la Silence of the Lambs
Bizarre, yet vagtastic.
She has a Ken doll front bottom.
Its a giant barbie doll!
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I bet that it is a barbie doll wearing it!!!!!
No comments at all!!!!
Creepy is the word alright. That seller has tons of creepy images - yuck.
I'm more impressed by this one:
http://www.amazon.com/Double-Dare-Reversible-Crotchless-Panty/dp/B0014GU0W2/ref=pd_sbs_a_2
I mean, I don't even know what they're trying to represent.
Euch, the smudging on that is disgusting...
Not as bad as this, however - female circumcision, anyone?
Damn, Homage beat me to it. >_<
This one should have also been posted
http://www.amazon.com/Love-Fifi-XXX-Crotchless-
G-String/dp/B0014GZ4IC/ref=pd_sbs_a_5/103-
0482646-4124641
just looks wrong lol
how about this one
another freaky lingerie item on a manikin
complete with a healed over dimple for a belly button and an attractive "upholstered-skin" vibe.
Ouch.
What is with all of these products? Not only is the Photoshop work terrible, but it has me wondering how hard it is for some people to just take off their underwear...
Well, this http://www.amazon.com/Crotchless-Open-Stretchy-Panty-Queen/dp/B0013QQ270/ref=pd_sbs_a_4 one is clearly the underwear on a mannequin, so this one might have been as well.
A mannequin with a belly button ring?! I think not.
What? No customer images? Boo.
clearly the first poster has never worn pantyhose.
Mannequin?
I can't see anything wrong with this picture - isn't that what all women look like?
When someone had the great idea to make crotchless and assless panties they where probably under them impression they where doing the world a favor. But then they messed up, by making them "one size" WTF is that?!?!? I hope that at the very least it is a small size...
When I saw the link that said "Original" I thought it meant "before photoshopping" and I got all excited.
Making the un-sellable... un-sellable!
I can't stop laughing!!!!! hehehe
At least you can imagine that it's a display dummy.
The plural of labia maiora ia labiae maiorae, BTW.
Hey, all the pictures taking from angels. As we all know from the movie Dogma they have no sex ;-)
i love how everyone here is saying how cheap and unwearable these are, and how they are pointless.
i have to assume that these users have never seen nor had the chance to appreciate a woman in lingerie.
and yes, trashy lingerie can be sexy as hell.
Chastity beads!
"i love how everyone here is saying how cheap and unwearable these are, and how they are pointless.
i have to assume that these users have never seen nor had the chance to appreciate a woman in lingerie.
and yes, trashy lingerie can be sexy as hell."
The good thing about trashy lingerie is that it can be ripped apart, but then the beads would go everywhere, you may slip....
this is the most incredible disaster so far because this asexual plastic andriod montsrosity is entirely intentional. why they didn't simply use a manequinn will remain a mystery.
Funny. It's okay to sell it, but still it's not to be shown.
I was laughing so hard. That is just incredible.
Damn! At least should thought on a mannequin before and have solved the issue of Amazon's TOS.
The one in the middle (wearing the black and white one) seems to have lost her bellybutton in the accident.
So do those 'bubbles' go up the backside, or are they just tucked in to any old hole?
"and yes, trashy lingerie can be sexy as hell."
Maybe in your funny mental world.
If I saw a woman wearing that, I would laugh.
There are guys (not many, thankfully) who get off on trashy lingerie specifically because it makes the woman look trashy and therefore stupid and inferior. There are also girls who will play into this because they think they have to.
Let them have each other, I say. Most men I know find bare skin much sexier than trashy lingerie.
I don't think this is the place to talk about the pros and cons of garments like these, it's about how utterly bad the retouching is!
The retouching is utterly bad and has distracted from the garment!
hehehee
I totally agree with mb. My mum told me all women look that way. Ah, before I forget, she allowed me to invite up to five people to my BIG party for my 45th birthday next week. Anyone want to come?
While the picture is terrifying, the comments made me lol more.
You know, I'm a guy. I like women in trashy clothing, and it's NOT because it supposedly makes women look inferior. Where do you get that crackpot theory from? Maybe it's because I have manners, but I love women, and it just makes it more erotic when a woman is wearing something... unusual.
Guys who get off on that because of the whole superior/inferior thing are assholes. They're probably also the same guys who think that if you chop off a guy's penis, he magically becomes a she. (Note: Women actually have their own sexual organs. Having your penis chopped off just makes you an ancient-styled eunuch.)
I don't get it, what's wrong with it... ;)
Geesh. Just display it on a mannequin! That is horrible.
That's what mine looks like.....lol.
Keeping to the Amazon theme. How big is the belly button on this one?
http://www.amazon.com/Silvermoon-Whistle-Crotchless-Panty/dp/B001A6S7NA/ref=pd_sbs_a_16
Oh wow - you mean that's NOT a mannequin? How do you know? Either way, yikes!
Am I the only one who thinks that those beads would be slightly...uncomfortable?
If that picture indeed is showing where the beads are intended to be placed...*shudder*
One can hope that these aren't to be worn for long.
I think everyone got WAAAY off-topic. Who cares what men like? Hahaha... honestly. I like what I like and if someone else likes it too then Yay!
Anyway, this is definitely a disaster. It looks like MS Paint was used for the "shading" of those two lines above her thighs. I think it looks stupid, and this has got to be a Barbie Doll, because we just don't look like that. Especially if something was *ahem* going "up our crack" in the front. Speaking of which, I don't know about the rest of the girls here, but when I saw that thing, I thought "ouch".
This photo makes me a little queasy. But all of your comments are making me laugh! :)
These are becoming really popular around the office where I work. Comfy, yet classy, and oh-so-practical.
"Guys who get off on that because of the whole superior/inferior thing are assholes. They're probably also the same guys who think that if you chop off a guy's penis, he magically becomes a she. (Note: Women actually have their own sexual organs. Having your penis chopped off just makes you an ancient-styled eunuch.)"
What the fuck?! You start off saying something sensible and then add some weird transphobia onto the end just...out of the blue!
Something tells me you have...issues.
Anyway...
Yeah, I can't see this underwear being sexy on anyone who actually has a vagina. It is probably better off being on the freaky photoshopped doll woman.
"Am I the only one who thinks that those beads would be slightly...uncomfortable?"
Horrifically so. Yowch!
"These are becoming really popular around the office where I work."
Strange mannequins??
I think they just posed it on a
Real Doll [Probably NSFW.]
My wife's Amazon account auto logged in when I went to view them in the wild...how wrong would it be to add them to her wishlist :P
Yeah, aside from the hilarious PS job, those look terribly uncomfortable. TERRIBLY.
not surprised. this certainly fits within the screwed-up, mechanized imagination of many american males.
as for trashiness, that's really simple: if you don't have money, trashy is good enough. Plastic, dead and fake is NOT.
PS also this looks paedophilic. real women have some hair down there.
I'm glad I'm not the only woman whose immediate reaction was "Ow! No way I'm putting up with those pastic things right next to my c*it!" Maybe her outer genitalia went on strike and went off somewhere with the pubic hair for vacation when they saw yet another wholly (pun intended) impractical piece of elastic with hard crud strung along the front zeroing in on their work area. Now she can't pee and it's her own fault for mistreating her coworkers at the orifice.
Sorry. Poor taste. Just needed to let loose with some Orifice Humor! ;D
"I think they just posed it on a Real Doll."
Nah, Zen - RealDolls, hair or not, are much more realistic. They actually have some frills down there like real women do. This looks like the Metitron from Dogma.
But... just... why not just be naked instead? I mean, it's not like the clothing is y'know, sexily concealing and hinting at what lies underneath. It's just a string of little plastic balls lodged right up your whatsit. Makes me wince even thinking about wearing it.
But then, the woman in the photo clearly doesn't have to worry about that, having no labia, hair, clitoris or genitals at all...
Re: the trashy thing, my own lttle meh comment... trashy is fine, as is classy, sultry, sexy, sweet and everything in between. But what isn't EVER sexy is "I put myself through physical discomfort to make myself an appealing item for you to look at".
"The plural of labia maiora ia labiae maiorae, BTW."
Labia majora is already a plural form in itself...
The customer reviews were the best bit
The blur tool: It can be your friend or it can be your enemy. Use it wisely.
Squick. O__O
How lucky we are to live in such liberal times as today... A few years earlier, naked legs were "pornographic" and therefore the gap between the both on the picture would have been to be etched away too... - and the skin colour might must have been changed to green.
BTW: Anyone knows the purpose of this... clothing ? Is it a kind of ridiculous chastity belt, or have the "bubbles" simply been scaled smaller to reveal their function ?
yeah, its barbie the movie, Lol
naw...she is real. They are grown in test tubes in old missle silos in North Dakota.
How about just using a friggin doll?! Nah... And pubic hair is so last season anyway.
Honey, there's trashy lingerie, and then there's TRASHY lingerie.
Lighten up!
BTW, I don't think this would get the reaction one would hope for-probably just laughter! It's kinda creepy, if you imagine it with actual... pubes.
Also, I haven't seen too many mannequins with belly-button rings. The belly button is PSd out in the black panties photo.
I don't know what's funnier, the product as it's intended to be worn, or the messed-up photo.
its looks more like a mannequin wearing it.
i've been going through these all night!!! They're fricken hilarious!!
Post a Comment