[insert joke about Christina Aguilera having wonky fingers here]
Original here. Thanks to Cary B, George and Rose!
Photoshopaholics
Subscribe
Posts
Comments
Saturday, July 5, 2008
Glamour: She's A Witch
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
55 comments:
Lol that's sorta gross
Just looks like some skin-colored fur.
What did the photoshoper try to do?!
It's like she's painfully crossing her fingers, hoping that no-one will notice the mess that the PhotoShopper has just made... ew...
Ew! D:
her face is weird, too. that barely even looks like her.
Oh my god, this is literally HORRIFYING. Oh vomit. It's like she's a character from a gothic fairytale and by day she's a pop star princess with a fluffy dog, and by night she's the wordless hermit witch with fingers like curled twigs who sneaks up in the middle of the night and strokes your face.
Lol @ Allie's comment. Witchy fingers stroking your face in the middle of the night. That cracked me up. XD
just skin coloured fur - yet another non disaster for the site!
If, on the off chance, that the photo just looks like that without any retouching, then it's a freakin' disaster to have NOT fixed it, 'kay?
Got to say, judging by other, recent pics of Xstina, they photoshopped some other parts of her body, too. She's a lot less top heavy in this pic than I remember...
So who gets the blame for the eyebrows? I'd like to say the photoshopper, but I think they were drawn in before the shoot.
"just skin coloured fur - yet another non disaster for the site!"
yeah, the kinda fur that grows out of wolverine womens's fingers, you know.
I'm never going to get to sleep tonight.
If you look at the picture here: http://jezebel.com/5021905/glamour-shots you can see its the dog's fur covering her finger making it look strange, not photoshop.
Fur people, what's wrong with you? That's her finger melting like a Nazi in India Jones. On Firefox, you can press CTRL+ to zoom in. You can probably do it on IE, but who cares.
Why were they photoshopping there anyway?
They didn't photoshop there.
Like Daniela said, if you look at the picture on Jezebel
http://jezebel.com/5021905/glamour-shots
it is just fur that is the same color as her finger.
Okay, on closer inspection it might be the case that its just the fur being the exact same shade and lining up perfectly (as improbable as it is seems). I think this would have been one of the nice times to photoshop the image. Change the fur colour there or something. It really is disturbing.
If it is the case that its not a real PSdisaster... I'm not going to complain about this being posted. Except that my brain is now broken.
I have to say, I noticed her waxy-looking face and sudden boob reduction before I saw her finger...or maybe she just really looks like that now?
How can you do that????!
It's nature!
I hardly know it seo!
Even IF it is just fur, like it certainly looks like on
http://jezebel.com/5021905/glamour-shots
then her finger is still WAY TOO LONG. The photoshopper messed this one up, big time.
I can see what it is, but they REALLY should have shaded that one rather anomalous bit of fur because no matter how close you look at it, it looks wrong and at a glance it looks HORRIBLE. There's also a weird little line going across and then curving, like they tried to make a separation between the fur and the finger - the line doesn't belong there. So they did notice and try to fix it - FAIL. All it needed was slight shading, and they couldn't even do that?
The poor dog looks unhappy. Scared, even. But who wouldn't, being held by creepy fingers like that!
That's plain awful!
I agree, the finger looks still too long.
Unless the fur actually melted to her ring finger, that is not fur that makes that finger look like it is turning into a wriggly snake.
THAT IS CREEPY ewwwww!
http://jezebel.com/5021905/glamour-shots
OK, that might be the fur, BUT that doesn't mean the photoshopper didn't touch that part, even a subtle editing can ruin the picture. A little smudge here and there, some fur cloning, dodging, burning and you get the melting finger.
Her fingers were "airbrushed" for sure right, so that could cause the fur to blend.
Since when do dogs have Barbie-flesh colored fur?
Not Photoshopping a critical area in a picture that's obviously Photoshopped still counts as a disaster.
Qué asco qué le pasa en el dedo!!
Ia! Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
That's not a disaster, I can do that with my fingers right now!
(Sorry couldn't help myself!)
I have this issue of the magazine in front of me. There is definitely a strange opacity-enhanced silhouette of her ring finger on top of her middle finger. Furthermore, there is a fingernail coming out of one of her knuckles. Eww.
I like that the second sentence in the Glamour article is "Her nails are blissfully manicured."
I can not see how this could possibly be fur. Here, I have provided a photo analysis: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v607/iscellardoor/DELETE.jpg
I wish blogspot had a "report spam comment" button. Sheesh. BTW- I hate to say it, but after intense scrutinization of both pics, it looks like fur to me... you can even see her fingernail if you look hard enough.
I agree with the above commenters who say that it should have been photoshopped to look less witch-fingery
"I have provided a photo analysis"
I've made one important addition to the photo analysis.
Image Here
I hope that clears up some of the confusion.
anon asshole, go back under your bridge.
About the picture: why are her breasts suddenly three sizes smaller than they are in real life? Why are her eyes four shades bluer? Why is her skin as flat and poreless as a newborn baby's?
She looks like a Stepford. Poor doggie; no wonder it's looking the other way.
seriously, how does shit like this happen?
what color would you call her hair? it looks like maybe "mop" or "straw". even IT looks photoshopped. sorry, i'm a girl, so i have no idea how big her gazongs might be in real life, but i know that's not a real hair color.
MY EYES!! MY EYES!! IT HURTS!!!!
You know, normally I hate all the "it's just the picture!" people... but it looks like they are right in this case. Weird.
It's not just the picture. See this link.
You'll see it's her finger and some fur. However, on the photo that PhotoshopDisasters display somebody probably noticed it and tried to "fix" it, f*cking it up even more. If you zoom in on the picture displayed here it's obvious somebody photoshopped the fur into her finger, making it a finger-extension or something.
LOL @ the interview
GLAMOUR: You look great, Christina. How quickly did you notice a change in your body?
CA: Being the perfectionist that I am, my attitude was, this had better hurry up--I want results! My trainer kept saying, "Give it time, you're looking great." Everyone around me was saying they could see a difference, but, you know, you're hardest on yourself. I did see my stomach get flatter and tighter and more muscle definition.
i honestly don't see how that can be fur.
that's a photoshop mistake, i think....no way is that dog fur...
I have this issue and I took a closer look...it's the dog hair covering her fingers, thats all.
Not QUITE all. They definitely futzed with it, yet managed to make it look worse.
Definitly a JPEG-disaster.
This image has been jpeg compressed a couple of times (scaled down and possibly edited in between), blending some tones in the fur and finger together and also creating some false shades.
it is gross. vom.
Saw the actual picture in a magazine..nothing was wrong with it. Not sure why it looks so here. You can see the end of her finger also. White polish.
The airbrushing on both the cover and inside story were so, so bad this month. She looks like a computerized comic book character. I can't believe Glamour put out an issue with the cover girl airbrushed to an all white oblivion.
OMG
It's definitely a PSD in reverse. There was no PS on the hand and this is gonna get confusing since she's wearing a ring on her index finger, not on her ring finger.
the link again... http://jezebel.com/5021905/glamour-shots
There is a bit of skin colored fur going on top of the tip of her finger, making it look like her finger extends more than it does, look closely, you'll see her white fingernail. ALSO, there's a little clump of white fur covering the middle of that same finger making it look thinner than it is. So it's two different colored bits of fur amazingly making it look like a distorted long, witch finger. But it's just real life, no PS. There should've been some PS here for sure, that's the disaster. Of course i'm sure PS was used on her face, hair etc, but in a typical way.
WTH, this time the word verification was Lymall, wasn't that the singer from Kajagoogoo?
Post a Comment