I'm not entirely au fait with Battlestar Galactica, but it looks as though this montage has left Captain Data with a rather obvious interest in Princess Leia's bosom. Or is she a Cyclon? I can never remember. Beam me up, Spocky!
Thanks to Vishal! Original is here!
Photoshopaholics
Subscribe
Posts
Comments
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Battlestar Galactica: Fracking Rack
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
52 comments:
Even funnier is that this is a remake of the original series of the same title and the blond broad in the pic is a dude in the original series. good times.
hahahahahaha... bloody pervert!
It's actually Wall Eye 'shopping! Now joining the ranks of detached heads and shrunken limbs.
If you swap the two, he'd end up staring at her backside. It would make more sense, perhaps...
ha
How is that a disaster ? You think it wasn't intentional ?
Somebody know what they were doing wen they put this cover together. I refuse to believe this is an accident.
If they were going to use sex to sell the movie, they wouldn't do it by having someone inexplicably staring at cleavage we can't see - they would have displayed the cleavage. God knows it's been done before.
It's a disaster because the weird, pseudo-sexual interplay between the characters distracts from the ad, thereby making it less effective. It's simply a matter or someone finding photos of three characters, but not adequately contemplating how they interplay when placed together.
But then, I suspect I may just be feeding trolls here.
That's not an ad, it's the cover of the new DVD. And I'm pretty sure it was intentional given the relationship of the characters. It's corny as all get out, yes, but not a mistake.
And hey, she's got a nice rack. Why not look?
I don't see the disaster. You see, I can't take my eyes off her boobs long enough to notice.
No disaster...just a pervert.
In all fairness, yes, his character would stare at her rack.
Of course, I do seriously doubt it was intentional.
Yet again, not a disaster.
So why look at the site at all jenn? Don't waste your time anymore.
"Even funnier is that this is a remake of the original series of the same title and the blond broad in the pic is a dude in the original series. good times."
Hehe - I really used to like the original; watched it every week. And Space 1999 too. Not Buck Rogers, though. Too unrealistic ;)
It's called "Cylon", not "Cyclon".
Actually, it looks like Apollo is staring at the "Season 4.0" label on the bottom of the cover. Probably thinking how corny it is to have the ".0" suffix to make it look more technical. In the meantime, The Admiral is looking for the head. Pretty awful composition.
It's called "Cylon", not "Cyclon".
It's called "a joke", not "my wikipedia page about Battlestar Galactica".
Oh, and he's checking to make sure she's human. Standard procedure.
Actually, it looks like Apollo is staring at the "Season 4.0" label on the bottom of the cover. Probably thinking how corny it is to have the ".0" suffix to make it look more technical. In the meantime, The Admiral is looking for the head. Pretty awful composition.
The .0 is because it's only the first half of the season. Not the entire thing. The next one will be 4.5
So why look at the site at all jenn? Don't waste your time anymore.
Because when they ARE photoshop disasters, they're amusing. But things like this, which are more "Lol, you can read more into it", aren't photoshopping issues.
What's not particularly amusing is the fact that on every single post someone is going on about how it's NOT a disaster and the author is a poopy-head and they're leaving leaving leaving, I tell you! Soon as they tell him a few more posts aren't disasters either. Then a few more. Just once it would be nice to read through the comments and laugh at the funny jokes people make without that stuff. Like this:
"It's called "a joke", not "my wikipedia page about Battlestar Galactica".
Hehehe.
Oh God! That's at least 3 & 1/2 Season too many.
The Cover is as confusing as is the whole 'Show'!
They fu**ed one of my fave Shows from Childhood. :(
Did you have any doubt that that's what they would do with it, Pink Panthress? Hell, Lucas himself ruined the best thing from my entire childhood - Star Wars. If he could do that, what hope could there be for network television?
I didn't even watch the new Heatmiser/Snowmiser special from Rankin Bass - could it possibly have been any good? I didn't want to take that chance.
That's not an ad, it's the cover of the new DVD.
(laughs loudly) And the difference between cover art and an advertisement is...
I'm convinced that there are a number of commenters who come on here and insist that each and every post is somehow not a "disaster," just to see if they can get someone to explain it, or, better yet, get angry.
Troll
It is something of a disaster, because there's really no depth to the composition. Apollo's supposed to be behind Starbuck but it really just looks like he was shrunk and stuck next to her. And the looking at her boobs thing is pretty distracting.
The other disaster is the number of people who think the original series was better. I don't expect everyone to like the new BSG, but if you think the original was great you need to watch it again.
Perhaps he is of the mind type who thinks in images and is easily disrupted when watching someone's face and speaking at the same time. So he stares away from the other person's face when speaking, and usually downwards (dictated by the neutral sight line which is 20° below horizontal) which happens to hit at the bosom area of people standing some feet away.
Happens to me all the time.
Surely that chap is just thinking, "why on Earth is that spoon-billed tomboy wearing a vest on top of another vest? I pity the badly tattooed wench."
I laugh at people who think Lucas has ruined the old Star Wars with the new Star Wars. Have you watched the old Star Wars recently? Really watched it? They're about on par with each other (with the very notable exception of Jar Jar Binks, who needs to be shot with a gun that shoots lightsabers). George Lucas is not a good writer.
You'd think that by the eleventy-sixth century they would have figured out a way to make a tattoo a different color besides the same old DEAD CORPSE BLUE that is all we ever see on all the tattooed freaks around. Oh yes. Not much for the guy to be staring at, is there?
Makes me glad I live in a PAL region, at least our cover art is half-decent: http://images.play.com/covers/5446495x.jpg
Boxy the Daggitt looks pretty good in the refabrication... frack!
Lol, this is hilarious.
"I laugh at people who think Lucas has ruined the old Star Wars with the new Star Wars. Have you watched the old Star Wars recently? Really watched it?"
Yes, and literally scores of times in the intervening years. Without the added CGI BS or the ruined Zero-G explosions. As I saw it the first time. All three of them (though I pretty much avoid the third, which was when the shark were jumped.)
I can't say whether they really ruined BSG as I have not watched those since their original run and certainly haven't bothered watching the new one. I don't watch network television, and the last Sci-Fi I tried to watch on network was Star Trek: The Next Generation pilot episode; it was so bad I turned it off and only watch the original Star Treks when they're on.
Stupid old people, they don't know what's good, right? Hehe.
One way or another folks it's pretty standard/bad photoshop and it's funny. And how is checking someone out considered a perversion?
NOT checking her out would be a perversion!
-Applauds AnnieMcPhee- I agree with your anti-whiners rant!
Tome - HAHA! SO good.
Also, will a comment be deleted if it refers to someone else as a "fuckwit"? Just, er, curious.
And funniest ever description of the PSD.
LOL that is funny
*Bows* Why thanks, gwy9 etc. :D It's not directed at Jenn, just at the fact that it has to happen every single time. The fact is a lot of these things are FUNNY (esp. with the craptions.) So are a lot of the comments. That's why I come here; for the lulz :)
it seem our host here at PSD is widening his scope and letting more conceptual disasters creep into the selection of daily examples. whatever!
Just another reader here to tell you that a creative decision that you don't agree with doesn't automatically make a "disaster".
How is looking at some hot broad's rack being a pervert? It's called sexual attraction to the opposite sex. Which last time I checked isn't perverted. Anyone who thinks that is perverted is gay.
Oh and this is not a disaster, it is genius.
He's so interested because it's the only part of the show that's at all interesting.
How is this a disaster? I'd totally be checking out Starbuck's rack too.
AnnieMcPhee said... "Just once it would be nice to read through the comments and laugh at the funny jokes people make without that stuff."
Golly, I wish that *just once* I could read through this blog without reading all the complaints about the complainers. Gee whiz.
(Ok, now your turn to complain about the complaints the complainers make about complaints. Or, uh... something like that.)
PS: this DVD cover is poorly designed, but not a disaster. Ha!
I know that you know, and I know that you know that I know that you know, that complaints about complaints about the complainers are completely legit. Just like the posts :D
I liked that they made Starbuck a woman in the re-imagined series, because in the 1980s, there was only one female in the cast - Jane Seymour. (No idea what her role was, just that she was in it and she rocked).
But hehehe, he's looking at her boobies!!!!
But if you watched the show you would know Capt. Adama is interested in her bosom but is only allowed to touch it about once every other season. can you blame the guy for looking?
It's cold in space. You can't tell because the "season 4.0" line is conveniently covering them, so you can't blame the guy for staring at it.
runescape money
runescape gold
runescape money
buy runescape gold
buy runescape money
runescape money
runescape gold
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
Warcraft Power Leveling
Warcraft PowerLeveling
buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items
runescape accounts
runescape gp
dofus kamas
buy dofus kamas
Guild Wars Gold
buy Guild Wars Gold
lotro gold
buy lotro gold
lotro gold
buy lotro gold
lotro gold
buy lotro gold
runescape money
runescape power leveling
runescape money
runescape gold
dofus kamas
cheap runescape money
cheap runescape gold
Hellgate Palladium
Hellgate London Palladium
Hellgate money
Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money
Tabula Rasa Credit
Tabula Rasa Credits
Hellgate gold
Hellgate London gold
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
Warcraft PowerLeveling
Warcraft Power Leveling
World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling
runescape powerleveling
eve isk
eve online isk
eve isk
eve online isk
tibia gold
Fiesta Silver
Fiesta Gold
Age of Conan Gold
buy Age of Conan Gold
aoc gold
呼吸机
无创呼吸机
家用呼吸机
呼吸机
家用呼吸机
美国呼吸机
篮球培训
篮球培训班
篮球夏令营
china tour
beijing tour
beijing travel
china tour
tibet tour
tibet travel
computer monitoring software
employee monitoring
I have to believe they do this intentionally because the've done it once before. If you look at the cover of the previous "Battlestar Galactica" (season 3), Jamie Bamber appears to be looking down at another charcters well displayed chest. I suppose the next set will have Mary McDonnel get the "Bamber Eyes" on the cover.
Boobiestar Galactica
again , this does not belong on this site.
It is funny, but is not a Photoshop disaster.
It is a Marketing/designer disaster.
Entirely disagree with this one. And who the hell says "au fait?" Stop trying to sound smart. You're not Fraiser, ya artsy fuck. *lol*
to be blunt, the blonde person looks like a man
You know, I always thought he was staring at the ring. It's much more prominent than boobies.
WV: piderfi
Post a Comment